So the past week was spent pondering digital networks –
their value to me and others, how I choose to represent myself in online networks, and how I see others represented in online networks. Some recent
discussions with colleagues brought up concerns about the authenticity of how
some people present themselves online, whether in individual posts or in group
discussions. Yes, it is possible to be authentic when writing and dialoguing
online, despite the fact that for many it is challenging to convey tone and inflection
in writing. However, I know I am not alone in expressing my disappointment in
seeing a post that reads as unnecessary self-promotion or a post that is
unquestionably inflammatory. In both instances, chances are the author is not
presenting their true nature - or are they?
I can’t resist the connection to Peter Finch’s outstanding
performance in the 1976 movie “Network” (pun intended):
Now, I don’t get angry like that at online misrepresentation, but my
frustration with how some choose to engage others online is perhaps what causes
me to be reluctant to dive headfirst into the deep end of online engagement.
(This is perhaps why I find my initial forays into Twitter awkward and clunky.)
I was intrigued with point/counterpoint presented in the
following articles:
The naysayer above worries about personal transformation in
repeated engagement with social media, fearing that it feeds a craving for
others’ approval; he also advocates for weaning students off of social media
and helping them “think more ambitiously about how they interact with the wider
world.”
The proponent, however, posits that academics need to
understand and relate to social media because this is how students are
communicating with each other, and that instructors and institutions need to be
able to engage with students in these platforms.
Where do I stand? Yes, I am dismayed at how some people are
obsessed with maintaining their online connections with other people, that they
have a hard time going 60 minutes without checking for a post or a message; I
see that craving for recognition and approval that Egan laments, and I am mystified. But I also see that, while there
can be richer ways to “interact with the wider world”, there are also an ever-growing
number of ways for people to interact and function online – and this
functionality is not going to go away. We as academics must be compelled to understand both the benefits and the drawbacks of these new platforms. I believe that my challenge—as an
instructor—is to educate myself as to the ways that my students are functioning
and need to be functioning online and attempt to meet them where they are –
without sacrificing who I am. I believe that the challenge facing my students—my
music education students, in particular—is to transform themselves somewhat as
they grow into their teacher identities. How will they continue to represent
themselves online and will that be the best representation of themselves as
leaders in the classroom?
Band Directors Group - FTW
In the course of the classes I teach, I find myself
regularly reminding my music education students that they are now part of a
very large network of teachers and that they should never feel isolated as they inch closer to running their own music programs. So
this often leads to discussions regarding how you can be connected both on- and offline. One of the
best concepts of networking online that I have encountered is a group on
Facebook called the Band Directors Group. It is a closed group, dedicated to
being a place where band directors at all levels can seek answers to problems
and help each other out; it’s also a place where directors vent their
frustrations and celebrate their successes. I see a wide range of highly relevant topics, and I see responses that are
consistently respectful, supportive, and authentic. The group is administered very well,
and the administrators are quick to step in if they feel that someone is close
to crossing a line. There is even a file repository set up for people to post
resources that they want to freely share with others. College music majors are
allowed to join this group, but they are requested not to post any comments until
they are actually working in the field.
The existence of the Band Directors Group is one of the
strongest reasons I can think of NOT to wean students off social media. It is a think tank, a brain trust, a community of people seeking to do the right thing. To me, it is a wonderful example of professionals connecting in
the best possible way and for all the right reasons – outstanding professional
growth. That is what I seek in any sort of network: the chance to represent my
true self and contribute to the conversation and to come away with something to
inform my own work.
Thanks for this post Phil. I have to say that I love that you used a gif from Network - perfect.
ReplyDeleteFor all of its downfalls social media does hold a possibility of connecting us to one another over time and space in ways that we have not seen before. It is really powerful and should not be underrated. Though I do think that being online in professional networks is different than in purely social circles. Students don't necessarily understand these and they are changing so quickly that we need to provide time for reflection on them.